I thought then it was a fantastic article, and would have supported it at the time. Furthermore, within this article, there is a brief explanation of the source of the names for the locomotives rivers in the region served in no less than three places lead, infobox, and the “Naming the locomotives” section, as well as the wikilink to the complete list of names. I tend to write alt text for the sight-impaired and for those viewing Wikipedia without images such as those reading the articles on a mobile phone in the developing world, so I don’t think that indicating colors and media are as irrelevant as others do. I am nominating this for featured article because three different copy-edits have been done since previous nomination by myself, Airplaneman, and ATC, and I feel everything is up to FA standards. This was why medieval government retained a domestic and informal quality right down to the 16th century. I am nominating this for featured article because I want to bring this article to the next level. This is more fair use than would normally be acceptable in an FA, but if there were ever a strong case for it, it’s here. The lead image which is not free, of course is utterly iconic and eye catching. I do just have a few small things I think ought to be addressed though inevitably. The Federal Court has dozens of judges, but its “full bench” for each case is just any three of its judges who didn’t hear the case at first instance. That is the argument of the key players who have commented on it, though most journalists have simply ignored it. Bulleid Pacific talk As I said above, “coherent mass of evidence” is in the body. As we have seen, an article about a particular class of steam locomotive is not the place to discuss the wheel arrangements involved, for this information compromises focus.
0 kommentar(er)
